Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 06:28
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Marvel vs. Capcom Fighting Collection June patch notes - EventHubs
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Julia DeVillers On Sign of Anal Cancer She Mistook For Menopause - TODAY.com
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
A Giant Hole Just Opened in The Sun – And It's Blasting Earth With Solar Wind - ScienceAlert
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
I can not sleep. what is the problem?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
If white people had been slaves, would WLM be a thing right now?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Jonathan Joss, ‘King of the Hill’ and ‘Parks & Recreation’ actor, dead at 59 after shooting - CNN
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
After 19 Years of Trying, She's Pregnant—Thanks to AI - Newser